quarta-feira, 18 de fevereiro de 2015

Is Connectivism A New Learning Theory Based on Old Ideas?

After reading the last two articles posted here (Why Academic Teaching Doesn't Help Kids Excel in Life and Connectivism and Dimensions of Individual Experience), I noticed that some ideas presented may be connected and so I want to leave here my thoughts on that.

I'm sure other links can be possibly made between both texts (and I would be interested in discussing them), but one called my attention in a especial way. Shelley Wright (2013) says that 

For the most part, kids who we consider “academic” tend to be good hoop jumpers. They’ve figured out the system and can navigate their way through the predictable demands of the system. But they are seldom truly engaged. Rarely are they transformed by their learning.
In other words, the successful students are usually the ones who understand what they have to reach and which path they need to follow. They are recognized and rewarded (good grades) by their abilities to follow rules and deliver whatever is expected by schools and teachers. It means that their success is measured in ways that do not foster the development of creativity and engagement.

Tschofen and Mackness (2012) wrote the following:

one speculation is that the most obviously active MOOC participants are individuals high in the psychological trait of conscientiousness, geared toward duty and achievement, perhaps in forms generally rewarded in formal learning environments. [...] For example, regular attendance at MOOC sessions, consistent (public) writing, and public collegial exchanges contribute to an overall perception of active connective learning. MOOCs, which point to such conscientious activities as the most appropriate learning processes, may appeal to these outwardly attentive and active learners more than those less oriented toward these forms of achievement and interaction.

The first author focus on the education of kids while Teschfen and Mackness discuss the education of adults, but I believe there is no difference in their messages. Looking at both passages it is not hard to see how the problems in formal education are being kept from childhood to adult life and from conservative to modern learning strategies. Now it may be a little frustrating and I apologize for that but, even though it is a big thing to discuss, I choose to leave it aside for the moment and go straight to another reflection that came to my mind.

Tschofen and Mackness (2012) talk about MOOCs, courses originally based on the connectivist theory, which has been striving to establish itself as a new learning theory. Students' creativity and engagement are considered of high importance in connectivism but, according to the passage presented above, connectivism may be failing in developing and evaluating those, just as "obsolete" learning theories do. Apparently, students who have "figured out the system and can navigate their way through the predictable demands of the system" without being necessarily engaged nor creative, are much likely to reach academic success in both settings presented in the articles. With that in mind, I must say that connectivism seems to me much less innovative than I first thought it was and I am curious to know if others have this same feeling. (If not, I would love to hear/read different points of view)

Before I finish, it is important to point out that we are discussing and criticizing the development of certain skills, the prioritization of some specific personal characteristics and the evaluation methods of the connectivism that may not be that innovative nor good to the students' development. On the other hand, we cannot ignore that the theory goes far beyond those aspects and still deserves attention and recognition. As it is so new, improvements in its ideas, strategies and methods are still possible and I believe that discussions like this can help its development. I am still open to change my mind 100 times! ;-)


Images:
http://edspoc.in/2014/12/10/deal-with-doubt-believe-in-yourself/
http://www.coetail.com/chem1tech/

14 comentários:

  1. A theory is a connected set of testable concepts or propositions that explains and predicts patterns of behavior. To test a theory, develop a model and determine if the propositions are supported. A good theory should be able to accommodate new data and be transferable across contexts. I've participated in a number of cMOOCs where the theory seems to hold. However, I can see that if you are just considering the xMOOC model as it has been co-opted by conventional educational institutions it looks like connectivism really offers no better explanation than extant theories.

    ResponderExcluir
    Respostas
    1. Thanks for your comment, Glen. The mentioned article "Connectivism and Dimensions of Individual Experience" talks about MOOCs in general and not the differences between xMOOCs and cMOOCs, but I believe it would be possible (and probably interesting) to go deeper into that matter.

      Excluir
  2. Impressive article surprising me never be saw this article i appreciated your ideas very creative mind it is helpful for us this article a lot of knowledge for me.thank for it Needpaperhelp

    ResponderExcluir
  3. The fruitful understudies are normally the ones who comprehend what they need to reach and which way they have to take after. They are perceived and remunerated (decent evaluations) by their capacities to take after principles. And if anyone who want to hire Research Paper Writing Service online academic service please visit our website.

    ResponderExcluir
  4. Connectivism is a learning hypothesis that clarifies how Internet advancements have made new open Write my assignment doors for individuals to learn and share data over the World Wide Web and among themselves.

    ResponderExcluir
  5. good essay thank you so much i will find you again. hope to read smth like this next time
    Computer Networking Tutor

    ResponderExcluir
  6. Sociology Homework Help
    Such intelligent work on the subject and ideal way of writing here. I am really impressed! 

    ResponderExcluir
  7. This was a great and interesting article to read. I have really enjoyed all of this very cool information. Assignment Help UK

    ResponderExcluir
  8. do my statistics homework for me
    good to share the human rights. it is very informative post . you ever share here.

    ResponderExcluir
  9. Nice post. I like the way you start and then conclude your thoughts. Thanks for this information .I really appreciate your work, keep it up
    finance assignment writing

    ResponderExcluir
  10. The productive understudies are ordinarily the ones who appreciate what they have to reach and which way they need to take after. A hypothesis is an associated set of testable ideas or recommendations that Research Paper Gurus clarifies and predicts examples of conduct. To test a hypothesis, build up a model and figure out whether the suggestions are bolstered.

    ResponderExcluir
  11. I concur with this guide skirts are getting toward be fundamental and they give another look to the character and they can recognize also, this is something worth being thankful for that How Can i Write my Research Paper we ought to uncovered out of it. We move your possessions London Airport Taxi rapidly and productively by consolidating top-quality bundling material, committed staff, world-class innovation.

    ResponderExcluir
  12. The puffer coat is an absolute necessity have Especially on the off chance that it gets super icy and cold where you live! My undisputed top choice are ones with the midriff belt that make the look more female. This coat is immaculate to wear when its breezy blustery and in the snow! It keeps you warm and a la mode.
    Please Visit Our Website: http://www.bayperfect.com/product/xxx-3-the-return-of-xander-cage-vin-diesel-fur-coat

    ResponderExcluir
  13. Nice post. Thanks for this information .I really appreciate your work, keep it up. i like the way you write these things..!!
    Highschool of the Dead Season 2

    ResponderExcluir